The nation's controversial move to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.
European Movement
In Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring similar restrictions.
- Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our children's youth". A law is expected to be formalized soon.
- The Norwegian government is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
- Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an options on the table".
- In Spain, the president has called on parliament to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
- In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
- The government in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.
For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a non-binding statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.
"An effective age restriction is a useful first step," commented one parliamentarian supporting the measure.
Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye
For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".
Last year, support grew behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government pledged to further research the topic.
Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people become eligible.
"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and suitable for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.
America: A Fragmented Picture
In the United States, action is largely occurring at the state level due to federal stalemate.
- Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
- Florida has passed a bill barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
- Virginia has approved a rule restricting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
- Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills mandating adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.
Despite widespread concern and calls from some individuals to mimic this path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.
Global Views
Outside of the West, further states are likewise exploring options.
- Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
- The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.
However, global agencies strike a more measured tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.
As this global discussion evolves, the policies of Australia and its followers show that governments globally are no longer prepared to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.
